Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Burn Care Res ; 43(3): 541-547, 2022 05 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35395676

RESUMO

Diabetes mellitus (DM) complicates the treatment of burn injuries. Foot burns in diabetic patients are challenging problems with unfavorable outcomes. National-scale evaluations are needed, especially with regard to limb salvage. We aim to characterize lower-extremity burns in persons with DM and evaluate the likelihood of amputation. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried from 2007 to 2015 extracting encounters with primary burn injuries of the feet using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th edition codes. Logistic regression modeled predictors of lower-extremity amputation. Covariables included age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities including DM, % burn TBSA, mechanism, and region of burn center. Poisson regression evaluated temporal incidence rate changes in DM foot burns. Of 116,796 adult burn encounters, 7963 (7%) had foot burns. Of this group, 1308 (16%) had DM. 5.6% of encounters with DM foot burns underwent amputation compared to 1.5% of non-DM encounters (P < .001). Independent predictors of lower-extremity amputation included DM (odds ratio 3.70, 95% confidence interval 2.98-4.59), alcohol use, smoking, chronic kidney disease, and burn size >20%, African-American/black race, male sex, and age >40 years (all P < .01). The incidence of DM foot burns increased over the study period with an incidence rate ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.05-1.10, P < .001). In conclusion, DM was associated with nearly a 4-fold increase in amputation after adjusting for covariables. Furthermore, the incidence of DM foot burns is increasing. Strategies for optimizing care in persons with DM foot burns are need to improve limb salvage.


Assuntos
Queimaduras , Diabetes Mellitus , Traumatismos do Pé , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Queimaduras/cirurgia , Traumatismos do Pé/terapia , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 69(7): e29717, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35441455

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) endure healthcare biases that are partially due to a lack of disease-specific education among healthcare providers. Furthermore, there is a paucity of age-appropriate health education materials for patients with SCD. To address this gap, we created the GRAPES tool (Game to Raise Awareness for Patient/Provider/Public Education of SCD; www.tinyurl.com/GRAPESgame) and hypothesized that utilization of the GRAPES tool will improve patient and provider SCD knowledge and mitigate healthcare bias. PROCEDURE: The GRAPES tool is an online, single-player trivia game. A feasibility study was conducted in pediatric patients with SCD at age 10 years or older and registered nurses. All participants were assessed for change in SCD-relevant knowledge and satisfaction post-gameplay. Providers were assessed for change in attitudes toward patients with SCD post-gameplay. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients and 25 providers were enrolled. All participants (P < 0.001), and specifically within the patient (P = 0.019) and provider (P < 0.001) cohorts, showed increased SCD knowledge post-gameplay. Both patients and providers reported high satisfaction with GRAPES. Provider negative attitudes were reduced (P = 0.007) post-gameplay without change in positive attitudes (P = 0.959). Providers demonstrated post-gameplay reduced (P = 0.001) belief that patients' changing behavior around providers indicates inappropriate drug-seeking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of the GRAPES tool as a potential digital, behavioral intervention to provide educational materials for patients and their providers in different clinical settings, improve knowledge about SCD, and decrease stigma against patients with SCD in the healthcare setting.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Vitis , Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Viés , Criança , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos
3.
J Clin Med ; 10(1)2020 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33396512

RESUMO

Fenofibrate slows the progression of clinical diabetic retinopathy (DR), but its mechanism of action in the retina remains unclear. Fenofibrate is a known agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), a transcription factor critical for regulating metabolism, inflammation and oxidative stress. Using a DR mouse model, db/db, we tested the hypothesis that fenofibrate slows early DR progression by activating PPARα in the retina. Relative to healthy littermates, six-month-old db/db mice exhibited elevated serum triglycerides and cholesterol, retinal gliosis, and electroretinography (ERG) changes including reduced b-wave amplitudes and delayed oscillatory potentials. These pathologic changes in the retina were improved by oral fenofibrate. However, fenofibrate did not induce PPARα target gene expression in whole retina or isolated Müller glia. The capacity of the retina to respond to PPARα was further tested by delivering the PPARα agonist GW590735 to the intraperitoneal or intravitreous space in mice carrying the peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE)-luciferase reporter. We observed strong induction of the reporter in the liver, but no induction in the retina. In summary, fenofibrate treatment of db/db mice prevents the development of early DR but is not associated with induction of PPARα in the retina.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...